Легенда:
новое сообщение
закрытая нитка
новое сообщение
в закрытой нитке
старое сообщение
|
- Напоминаю, что масса вопросов по функционированию форума снимается после прочтения его описания.
- Новичкам также крайне полезно ознакомиться с данным документом.
[RC5] -bench 8600GT, 8800Ultra, 9600GT в Win32 15.12.08 12:29 Число просмотров: 4875
Автор: panam Статус: Незарегистрированный пользователь
|
Кому интересно, тесты CUDA клиентов для Win32. Клиент последний с бигзиллы.
8600GT:
-cpuinfo
"dnetc v2.9102-508-GTR-08121316 for Win32 (WindowsNT 5.1).
Automatic processor identification tag: 1
name: GeForce 8600 GT (4 MPs)
Estimated processor clock speed (0 if unknown): 1404 MHz
Number of processors detected by this client: 1
Number of processors supported by this client: 128"
-bench
"[Dec 15 08:28:00 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:28:20 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:17.00 [76,200,743 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:28:20 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:28:38 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.12 [75,896,731 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:28:38 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:28:57 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.26 [76,672,129 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:28:57 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:29:17 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:17.07 [76,080,712 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:29:17 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:29:36 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.93 [75,060,513 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:29:36 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:29:55 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.84 [75,674,652 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:29:55 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:30:14 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:16.23 [71,528,377 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:30:14 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:30:33 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.20 [71,481,062 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:30:33 UTC] RC5-72: using core #8 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:30:52 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #8 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.42 [72,248,777 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:30:52 UTC] RC5-72: using core #9 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:31:11 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #9 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:16.35 [77,379,719 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:31:11 UTC] RC5-72: using core #10 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:31:30 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #10 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.87 [76,234,169 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:31:30 UTC] RC5-72: using core #11 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:31:49 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #11 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.42 [77,536,594 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:31:49 UTC] RC5-72: using core #12 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:32:08 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #12 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:16.23 [67,770,952 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:32:08 UTC] RC5-72: using core #13 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:32:27 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #13 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:17.07 [67,864,169 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:32:27 UTC] RC5-72: using core #14 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:32:46 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #14 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.53 [67,950,716 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:32:46 UTC] RC5-72: using core #15 (CUDA 2-pipe 256-thd busy wait)."
9600GT
-cpuinfo
"dnetc v2.9102-508-GTR-08121316 for Win32 (WindowsNT 5.1).
Automatic processor identification tag: 1
name: GeForce 9600 GT (8 MPs)
Estimated processor clock speed (0 if unknown): 1850 MHz
Number of processors detected by this client: 1
Number of processors supported by this client: 128"
-bench
"[Dec 15 08:05:32 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:05:51 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:16.07 [195,827,942 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:05:51 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:06:10 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.40 [195,526,854 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:06:10 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:06:28 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.10 [194,899,968 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:06:28 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:06:48 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:16.43 [198,468,682 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:06:48 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:07:07 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:17.06 [193,075,868 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:07:07 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:07:25 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.17 [195,367,572 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:07:25 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:07:44 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:16.18 [189,526,032 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:07:44 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:08:03 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.46 [191,260,361 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:08:03 UTC] RC5-72: using core #8 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:08:22 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #8 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.64 [195,357,280 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:08:22 UTC] RC5-72: using core #9 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:08:41 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #9 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:16.25 [196,952,064 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:08:41 UTC] RC5-72: using core #10 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:09:01 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #10 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.12 [193,855,515 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:09:01 UTC] RC5-72: using core #11 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:09:20 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #11 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.15 [196,157,472 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:09:20 UTC] RC5-72: using core #12 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:09:39 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #12 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:16.20 [157,863,936 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:09:39 UTC] RC5-72: using core #13 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:09:57 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #13 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.54 [155,990,344 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:09:57 UTC] RC5-72: using core #14 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:10:17 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #14 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.46 [159,256,975 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:10:17 UTC] RC5-72: using core #15 (CUDA 2-pipe 256-thd busy wait)."
8800Ultra (2 штуки в системе)
-cpuinfo
"dnetc v2.9102-508-GTR-08121316 for Win32 (WindowsNT 5.1).
Automatic processor identification tag: 1
name: GeForce 8800 Ultra (16 MPs)
Estimated processor clock speed (0 if unknown): 1512 MHz
Number of processors detected by this client: 2
Number of processors supported by this client: 128"
-bench
"[Dec 15 08:44:21 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:44:37 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:13.84 [322,337,578 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:44:37 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:44:56 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.39 [265,328,396 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:44:56 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:45:16 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.48 [269,172,285 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:45:16 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:45:32 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:13.68 [320,881,101 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:45:32 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:45:51 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.46 [266,261,182 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:45:51 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:46:07 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:13.70 [320,531,788 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:46:07 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:46:24 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:14.28 [312,298,184 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:46:24 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:46:43 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.45 [266,641,773 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:46:43 UTC] RC5-72: using core #8 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:47:00 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #8 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:14.29 [312,298,184 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:47:00 UTC] RC5-72: using core #9 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:47:16 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #9 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:13.35 [329,761,335 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:47:16 UTC] RC5-72: using core #10 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:47:35 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #10 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.32 [265,825,783 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:47:35 UTC] RC5-72: using core #11 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:47:51 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #11 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:13.40 [328,131,495 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:47:51 UTC] RC5-72: using core #12 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 08:48:08 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #12 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:15.31 [290,448,268 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:48:08 UTC] RC5-72: using core #13 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 08:48:27 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #13 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.34 [267,314,253 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:48:27 UTC] RC5-72: using core #14 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 08:48:45 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #14 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:15.32 [291,881,658 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 08:48:45 UTC] RC5-72: using core #15 (CUDA 2-pipe 256-thd busy wait)."
Просто счет:
"[Dec 15 08:57:07 UTC] RC5-72: Summary: 54 packets (54.00 stats units)
0.00:07:50.03 - [493.43 Mkeys/s]
[Dec 15 08:57:07 UTC] RC5-72: 0 packets remain in buff-in.r72
[Dec 15 08:57:07 UTC] RC5-72: 63 packets (63.00 stats units) are in
buff-out.r72
[Dec 15 08:57:19 UTC] RC5-72 #b: Completed 00:07348092:00000000 (1.00 stats units)
0.00:00:11.84 - [362,628,109 keys/s]
[Dec 15 08:57:19 UTC] RC5-72 #b: Loaded random 00:02C94A65:00000000:1*2^32
[Dec 15 08:57:19 UTC] RC5-72: Summary: 55 packets (55.00 stats units)
0.00:08:01.15 - [490.95 Mkeys/s]
[Dec 15 08:57:19 UTC] RC5-72: 0 packets remain in buff-in.r72
[Dec 15 08:57:19 UTC] RC5-72: 64 packets (64.00 stats units) are in
buff-out.r72
[Dec 15 08:57:22 UTC]BreakShutting down...
[Dec 15 08:57:23 UTC] RC5-72 #b: Saved 00:02C94A65:00000000:1*2^32 (32.80% done)
0.00:00:03.98 - [353,658,772 keys/s]
[Dec 15 08:57:23 UTC] RC5-72 #a: Completed 00:0B062D31:00000000 (1.00 stats units)
0.00:00:14.28 - [300,725,901 keys/s]
[Dec 15 08:57:23 UTC] RC5-72: Summary: 56 packets (56.00 stats units)
0.00:08:05.15 - [495.75 Mkeys/s]
[Dec 15 08:57:23 UTC] RC5-72: 1 packet (1.00 stats units) is in buff-in.r72
[Dec 15 08:57:23 UTC] RC5-72: 65 packets (65.00 stats units) are in
buff-out.r72
[Dec 15 08:57:23 UTC] Shutdown complete."
|
|
|