Легенда:
новое сообщение
закрытая нитка
новое сообщение
в закрытой нитке
старое сообщение
|
- Напоминаю, что масса вопросов по функционированию форума снимается после прочтения его описания.
- Новичкам также крайне полезно ознакомиться с данным документом.
[RC5] -bench 8500GT 15.12.08 18:17 Число просмотров: 4635
Автор: panam Статус: Незарегистрированный пользователь
|
Драйвера 180.84 beta
-cpuinfo
"dnetc v2.9102-508-GTR-08121316 for Win32 (WindowsNT 5.1).
Automatic processor identification tag: 1
name: GeForce 8500 GT (2 MPs)
Estimated processor clock speed (0 if unknown): 1566 MHz
Number of processors detected by this client: 1
Number of processors supported by this client: 128"
-bench
"Dec 15 15:03:19 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 15:03:39 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:16.56 [42,976,812 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:03:39 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 15:03:58 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.56 [37,939,124 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:03:58 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 15:04:18 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.76 [43,365,201 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:04:18 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 15:04:38 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:16.54 [42,854,000 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:04:38 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 15:04:57 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.43 [39,723,439 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:04:57 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 15:05:16 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:16.54 [42,854,000 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:05:16 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 15:05:35 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:17.03 [36,410,784 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:05:35 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 15:05:55 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:17.12 [40,231,311 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:05:55 UTC] RC5-72: using core #8 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 15:06:14 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #8 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:17.01 [36,579,635 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:06:14 UTC] RC5-72: using core #9 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 15:06:33 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #9 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:16.57 [43,082,926 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:06:33 UTC] RC5-72: using core #10 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 15:06:52 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #10 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.46 [38,676,546 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:06:52 UTC] RC5-72: using core #11 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 15:07:12 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #11 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:17.10 [42,759,064 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:07:12 UTC] RC5-72: using core #12 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd busy wait).
[Dec 15 15:07:31 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #12 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd busy wait)
0.00:00:16.81 [36,094,015 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:07:31 UTC] RC5-72: using core #13 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 15 15:07:51 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #13 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us)
0.00:00:16.90 [36,667,392 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:07:51 UTC] RC5-72: using core #14 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 15 15:08:11 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #14 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep dynamic)
0.00:00:17.34 [35,201,717 keys/sec]
[Dec 15 15:08:11 UTC] RC5-72: using core #15 (CUDA 2-pipe 256-thd busy wait)"
|
|
|