Легенда:
новое сообщение
закрытая нитка
новое сообщение
в закрытой нитке
старое сообщение
|
- Напоминаю, что масса вопросов по функционированию форума снимается после прочтения его описания.
- Новичкам также крайне полезно ознакомиться с данным документом.
[RC5] Бенч 8200 на новой версие:) 17.12.08 07:56 Число просмотров: 6100
Автор: maestro_sochi <maestro> Статус: Member
|
dnetc v2.9102-508-GTR-08121316 for Win32 (WindowsNT 5.1).
Please provide theentireversion descriptor when submitting bug reports.
The distributed.net bug report pages are at http://bugs.distributed.net/
Using email address (distributed.net ID) 'хххххх@mail.ru'
[Dec 17 04:34:34 UTC] Automatic processor detection found 1 processor.
[Dec 17 04:34:34 UTC] Automatic processor type detection found
a GeForce 8200 (1 MPs) processor.
[Dec 17 04:34:34 UTC] RC5-72: Running micro-bench to select fastest core...
[Dec 17 04:36:20 UTC] RC5-72: using core #9 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Dec 17 04:36:20 UTC] RC5-72: Loaded random 53:9C9C1903:00000000:1*2^32
[Dec 17 04:36:20 UTC] RC5-72: 0 packets remain in buff-in.r72
[Dec 17 04:36:20 UTC] RC5-72: 0 packets are in buff-out.r72
[Dec 17 04:36:20 UTC] 1 cruncher has been started.
.....10%.....20%
[Dec 17 04:37:17 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Dec 17 04:37:36 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd bus ...
0.00:00:16.65 [15,899,775 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:37:36 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 17 04:37:56 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sle ...
0.00:00:17.32 [13,951,542 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:37:56 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic).
[Dec 17 04:38:15 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sle ...
0.00:00:16.57 [14,721,387 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:38:15 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd busy wait).
[Dec 17 04:38:35 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd bu ...
0.00:00:16.89 [15,899,775 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:38:35 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 17 04:38:53 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sl ...
0.00:00:16.54 [12,429,560 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:38:53 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sleep dyna ...
[Dec 17 04:39:14 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #5 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd sl ...
0.00:00:17.34 [12,437,855 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:39:14 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd busy wait).
[Dec 17 04:39:32 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd bu ...
0.00:00:16.48 [8,744,976 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:39:32 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 17 04:39:51 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sl ...
0.00:00:16.32 [8,196,096 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:39:51 UTC] RC5-72: using core #8 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sleep dyna ...
[Dec 17 04:40:10 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #8 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd sl ...
0.00:00:16.54 [8,287,756 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:40:11 UTC] RC5-72: using core #9 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Dec 17 04:40:30 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #9 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd bus ...
0.00:00:16.45 [16,138,272 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:40:30 UTC] RC5-72: using core #10 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 17 04:40:49 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #10 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sl ...
0.00:00:17.32 [12,404,494 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:40:49 UTC] RC5-72: using core #11 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sleep dyna ...
[Dec 17 04:41:08 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #11 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd sl ...
0.00:00:17.31 [12,621,983 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:41:09 UTC] RC5-72: using core #12 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd busy wait).
[Dec 17 04:41:28 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #12 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd b ...
0.00:00:16.73 [7,494,144 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:41:28 UTC] RC5-72: using core #13 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 17 04:41:47 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #13 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd s ...
0.00:00:16.32 [7,360,512 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:41:47 UTC] RC5-72: using core #14 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd sleep dyn ...
[Dec 17 04:42:06 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #14 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd s ...
0.00:00:16.32 [7,356,432 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:42:06 UTC] RC5-72: using core #15 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Dec 17 04:42:24 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #15 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd bu ...
0.00:00:16.32 [8,327,184 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:42:24 UTC] RC5-72: using core #16 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 17 04:42:43 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #16 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd sl ...
0.00:00:16.32 [8,208,384 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:42:43 UTC] RC5-72: using core #17 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd sleep dyna ...
[Dec 17 04:43:02 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #17 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd sl ...
0.00:00:16.51 [8,287,756 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:43:02 UTC] RC5-72: using core #18 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd busy wait).
[Dec 17 04:43:21 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #18 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd b ...
0.00:00:16.71 [7,461,583 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:43:21 UTC] RC5-72: using core #19 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd sleep 100us).
[Dec 17 04:43:40 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #19 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd s ...
0.00:00:16.34 [7,356,432 keys/sec]
[Dec 17 04:43:40 UTC] RC5-72: using core #20 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd sleep dyn ...
[Dec 17 04:43:59 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #20 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd s ...
0.00:00:16.32 [7,360,512 keys/sec]
|
|
|